AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
30 paragraphs · 291 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has
been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in
connection with F.I.R. No.276/2004, registered at Police Station
Sadar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections
279, 337 and 338 IPC.
The petitioner was facing trial in the Court below for the
above offences which are bailable. He jumped bail on 12.9.2007
and was rearrested on 28.4.2017. An explanation has been
furnished that the matter had been settled amicably between the
parties and thus, the petitioner did not come to attend the Court
in the bonafide belief that the case had ended.
In this background and having regard to the facts and
circumstances available on record but without expressing any
opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the
petitioner deserves to be granted one more opportunity to face
trial while being on bail subject to condition that he shall
henceforth, remain present on each and every date of hearing
before the trial court.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed subject to the condition noted above and it is directed that
the petitioner Sunil Kumar arrested in connection with the F.I.R.
No.276/2004, registered at Police Station Sadar, District Sri
Ganganagar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a
personal bond of Rs.80,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.40,000/-
each (out of which one shall be a local surety) to the satisfaction
of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that
Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so.
