High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunil @ Sunil Kumar and Another vs Lal Singh @ Lalian

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 March 2009 · Citation: (2009) 154 PLR 325

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Kannan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 1
RESULT
Allowed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 442 words

K. Kannan, J.—The defendant who challenged the mode of valuation by the plaintiff had his objections rejected by the Court below and hence a cause for revision to this Court.

2.

The suit has been filed for declaration to the effect that plaintiff is the owner in possession of 1/6th share of the land and for a further relief that the gift deed registered on 26.5.2003 for the land situate at Village Dongra Ahir in favour of the defendant was against law and based on fraud and misrepresentation and null and void. Admittedly the plaintiff was a party to the gift deed and relief of declaration was sought on the ground that the defendant was trying to usurp possession and claim title of the property under the gift deed. In effect the plaintiff was seeking for a cancellation of the document to which he was a party. The Court below has observed that the challenge had not been to a sale deed but it was only with reference to gift deed and there being no relief for possession no ad valorem court fee is payable.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner refers to decision of this Court in Zora Singh and Ors. v. Kehar Singh and Ors. (1981) 13 Rev.L.R. 491 that a suit for permanent Injunction alleging a gift deed to be null and void was held to be required to be valued as one for cancellation of a document and provision of Article 1 Schedule 1 was attracted and not Section 7 Clause IV(b) and the Court Fees Act. Another decision of the same issue was rendered in Nand Kaur and Ors. v. Gurdev Kaur and Ors. (1957)59 P.L.R. 500 where it was held that for a suit for declaration by a donor challenging a gift which he had made, the assessment of Court fee shall be under Article 1 Schedule I and ad valorem court fee was payable under the said Article. The impugned decision rendered by the Court below conflicts with the decisions cited above and the reasoning that a cancellation would be necessary only in case of sale deed and not will) reference to gift deed is wholly erroneous.

4.

The order of the Court below is set aside and the plaintiff shall be called upon to pay ad valorem court fee under relevant provisions of Article 1 Schedule 1 of the Court Fees Act within the time stipulated by the Court below and if the Court fee is not paid as stipulated, the Court may take appropriate action and pass suitable orders in accordance with law.

5.

The Civil Revision is allowed in the above terms.