High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Ydav And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 2 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 PAT CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 435, 504, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6470 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 494 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Buxar Muffasil PS Case No. 374 of 2019 dated 06.12.2019 instituted under Sections

147/148/149/341/323/307/435/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioners and six others is of brutal assault on the informant and other members of his family and also of burning the

field on which there were bundles of grain.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it was the informant and his associates who were aggressors and they have brutally assaulted the

father of petitioners no. 6 and 8 due to which he died in the course of treatment. It was further submitted that only to save themselves, they had

lodged the present case and even the so called injuries have been found to be simple in nature whereas in the case filed by the brother of petitioners

no. 6 and 8, who is also an accused in the present case, in which there is allegation of brutal assault and also under the Arms Act as their father was

fired upon. Learned counsel submitted that the police during investigation have also found the allegation of burning of grains to be false. Learned

counsel submitted that the petitioners have no other criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the petitioners have also assaulted the informant and another person. However, he was not in a position to controvert

the fact that in the counter attack, there has been death of the father of petitioners no. 6, 8 and another co-accused, who is not before the Court, and

further that no evidence of burning of any grain has been found.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Buxar Muffasil PS

Case No. 374 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.One of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioners. The petitioners and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioners. The petitioners

shall also give an undertaking to the Court that they shall not indulge in any criminal activity. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or

the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of their bail bonds. The petitioners shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and

every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of their bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.