Sunilkumar C.V. @Kurumachan vs State Of Kerala

This Bail Application filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) was heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner is the accused in crime No.109/2021 of Nedumudy Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging

offences punishable under Sections 451, 354A and 354 IPC.

The prosecution case is that the accused reached the house of the defacto complainant with the intention to outrage her modesty on the promise to

get back the money due in respect of the materials purchased for the construction of the house of the defacto complainant. Even though the amount

was paid, the petitioner caught hold of the chest of the defacto complainant. Hence, it is alleged that the offence was committed by the petitioner.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is more amount

due to the petitioner and the petitioner insisted for payment of the amount, the defacto complainant paid only an amount of Rs.4,500/-. Since the

petitioner insisted for the balance amount, a false case was filed. The counsel submitted that the offence under Section 354 IPC is not made out. The

Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applicatoin.

After hearing both sides, I think that this Bail Application can be allowed on stringent conditions. It is true that the allegation is very serious. But the

prosecution can prove the case only through oral evidence. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary in the facts and circumstances of

the case. Therefore, the petition can be allowed on stringent conditions.

Moreover, the 2nd wave of COVID-19 is spreading in the country and the citizens are facing serious difficulties. In the state of Kerala, the 2nd

wave of the pandemic is creating lot of problems and even the day-to-day life of the citizens are affected. Everyday, about 25,000 people are tested

positive with COVID-19. In such circumstances, this Court has to consider this fact also while considering bail applications. The life is more important

than anything. Therefore, I am considering this bail application based on the above pandemic situation.

Moreover, considering the need to follow social distancing norms inside prisons so as to avert the spread of the novel Corona Virus Pandemic, the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Re: Contagion of COVID-19 Virus In Prisons case (Suo Motu Writ Petition(C) No.1 of 2020) and a Full Bench of this

Court in W.P(C)No.9400 of 2020 issued various salutary directions for minimizing the number of inmates inside prisons. These happened during the

1st wave of COVID-19 season.

Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that, the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram P. v.

Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE 870), after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail

remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that, the accused has the opportunity of securing

fair trial.

Considering the dictum laid down in the above decision and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Bail Application is allowed

with the following directions:

The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within three weeks from today and shall undergo interrogation;

After interrogation, if the Investigating Officer proposes to arrest the petitioner, he shall be released on bail executing a bond for a sum of

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the officer concerned;

The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required. The petitioner shall co-operate with the

investigation and shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

The petitioner shall not leave India without permission of the Court;

The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence alleged in this case.

The petitioner shall strictly abide by the various guidelines issued by the State Government and Central Government with respect to keeping of

social distancing in the wake of Covid 19 pandemic;

If any of the above conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court can cancel the bail in accordance to law, even though the bail is

granted by this Court.