High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunita Finlease Limited vs Tarvinder Singh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 30 September 2019 · Citation: (2019) 09 CHH CK 0188

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WP227 No. 739 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 200 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

Heard on admission.

2.

Mr. Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the trial Court had appointed Commissioner at the instance of the plaintiff on

08/05/2013 and issued commission for demarcation, yet the demarcation report has not been received till date and the matter in pending since

15/10/2012, as such, it may be directed to be expedited.

3.

It is quite pertinent that though the trial Court had appointed Commissioner on 08/08/2013 to conduct demarcation, but till date no demarcation

report has been received and the matter is pending with no substantial progress. Be that as it may, learned trial Court is directed to call for the

Commissioner's report and conclude the trial of civil suit No. 3-A/2012 (Sunita Finlease Vs. Harcharan Sahni & Ors.) within three months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of at the admission stage without notice to the other side. The respondents are at

liberty to file suitable application for modification, if any.

5.

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court by e-mail/fax for needful and compliance.