High CourtsSingle Bench

Sunita & Others vs Savin Bansal & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0240

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 218 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 99 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPSS No. 1395 of 2016, filed by the petitioners, was disposed of vide order dated 29.03.2017 with a direction to District Magistrate, Almora to

decide petitioners’ representation claiming regularisation of their services.

2.

Today, Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement at the bar

that pursuant to the order of this Court, District Magistrate, Almora has considered and decided petitioners’ representation.

3.

Since the order stands complied with, therefore, the contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.