High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 11 SHI CK 0144

Suraiya Kumari vs State of Himachal Pradesh and others.

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 17 November 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Sharma, J · Kurian Joseph, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 9769 of 2011-G

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 202 words

Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

(A) That petitioner may very kindly be granted increments during the tenure period and the said service may be counted for pension, as in the case of ad hoc appointees in the education department.

2.

The petitioner claims the benefit of increments during the tenure period of service rendered by her and also count the said period for the purpose of pension. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by the judgment of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & another and other connected matters. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above.

3.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.