AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 408 wordsRajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J
This first criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short “SC/ST
Actâ€) has been filed against the order dated 17/5/2021 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhind in Bail Application No.620/2021 by which
anticipatory bail application of the appellant has been rejected.
The appellant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.22/2021 registered at Police Station Amayan, District Bhind for offence under
Sections 376 and 506 of IPC and Sections 3 (1)(w)(ii) and 3 (2) (v) of SC/ST Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant â€" Suraj Baghel that the appellant has been falsely implicated. He has not committed any offence.
Rather, the husband of the prosecutrix borrowed some money from the applicant and to escape from the aforesaid liability of repayment, false case
has been registered against him. As per prosecution story, the date of incident is 10/4/2018 and the written complaint has been filed on 19/3/2021 and
no explanation has been given for the aforesaid inordinate delay in filing the complaint. It is further submitted that the prosecutrix is a married lady and
is having two small kids and she is aged around 28 years. Hence, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the allegations levelled are of serious nature and in case of grant of
anticipatory bail to the applicant, investigation as well as prosecution evidence would be adversely affected. Hence, prayed to reject the appeal,
considering the gravity of offence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through VC and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the available record.
Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant and other facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on
merits of the case, the appeal is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, present appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting
Authority/Investigating Officer.
Appellant shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. He shall further abide by other conditions
as enumerated under sub-Section 2 of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Appeal stands allowed and disposed of.
Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.
