High CourtsSingle Bench

Suraj Kumar and Another vs Punjab National Bank and Another

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 29 July 2013 · Citation: (2013) 07 JH CK 0181

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.P. Bhatt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Suits Valuation Act, 1887 — Section 8
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
F.A. No. 211 of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 184 words

P.P. Bhatt, J.—The office has raised objection with regard to maintainability of the instant First Appeal on the ground that the valuation of appeal mentioned in page 2 of memo is Rs. 1,23,545/- hence the pecuniary jurisdiction of the instant first appeal has to be before the court of District Judge. I have perused a decision given in a case of Srimati Sumitra Devi and Others Vs. Jahnvi Prasad Sah where in it has been specifically held that as per Section 8 of Suit Valuation Act, value as determinable for the purpose of computation of court fee shall be value of purpose of jurisdiction. It is also held that in a suit for resolution of partnership and render of accounts, valuation given in plaint would determine forum of appeal and not amount for which a decree be passed by trial court.

2.

In the instant case also the valuation given in plaint was Rs. 3,16,774/- hence the first appeal is maintainable before this court. In view of the above decision, the office objection raised regarding maintainability of the aforesaid appeal shall not be sustainable.