High CourtsSingle Bench

Suraj Mahto vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 11 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 JH CK 0003

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ambuj Nath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25(1A), 25(1B), 25(6), 26
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 8791 of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 209 words

Ambuj Nath, J

1.

Heard the parties.

2.

Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 1133 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 25(1-A)/25(1-B) a, 25(6)/26 of Arms Act, pending in the court of Ms. Kanchan Kumari, learned J.M.F.C-VI, Ranchi.

3.

On 31.03.2024 at 7.00 a.m., Pithoria Police on the basis of confidential information apprehended this petitioner from a place behind Muretha School. On search, a loaded country made pistol along with live cartridge was recovered from his possession.

4.

It was submitted that the petitioner is in custody for about eight months. It was further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It was finally submitted that the offence alleged is triable by the court of Judicial Magistrate.

5.

Mr. Azeemuddin, learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

In view of the submissions made above, petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Ms. Kanchan Kumari, learned J.M.F.C-VI, Ranchi in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 1133 of 2024.