AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
48 paragraphs · 477 wordsThe present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 301 dated
28.08.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149,
307, 506 read with Section 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at
Police Station Dadri City, District Bhiwani.
Heard.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the court, Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana,
who is present in the Court accepts notice and submits that intimation by
Registry informing of fixation of the petition has already been received and
record of the case is available with her.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
was having property dispute with the complainant and a civil suit is pending
in this regard. Complainant has implicated the petitioner in this FIR with
the allegation that on 27.08.2016, he accompanied by six/seven persons hit
motorcycle of the petitioner and his co-accused inflicted injuries on the
person of complainant. As per complainant, the petitioner was having a
katta in his hand but no firearm injury was caused. Police has completed the
investigation and challan has been presented against the petitioner in which
charge has not been framed so far.
Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is the main
accused at whose instance the entire occurrence had taken place, as such,
grant of bail to the petitioner will effect the case of prosecution as he may
prevail upon the prosecution witnesses.
In the FIR, complainant has not alleged any reason for the
petitioner and his co-accused for causing injuries to him. However, perusal
of order dated 19.12.2016 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani,
declining bail to the petitioner shows that another FIR bearing no. 151 has
already been registered against the petitioner on the complaint of
complainant/injured. This shows element of enmity of complainant with
petitioner.
Keeping in view the fact that no injury was attributed to the
petitioner and on giving a careful thought to submissions of learned counsel
for the petitioner and learned State counsel but without expressing any
opinion on merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-
Surender is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond
and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned Chief Judicial
Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-
a. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions
mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.
b. In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the
benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand
withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel
his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his
presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the
petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh.
c. He shall not leave the country without the previous
permission of the Court.
