High CourtsSingle Bench

Surender @ Bindrakhia vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 P&H CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 4398 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 15
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 40817 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 250 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

This petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 166, dated 9.8.2021, under Section 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan, District Fatehabad.

As per the case of the prosecution on 9th August, 2021, police party checked a car and apprehended Surender Singh (petitioner) and co-accused Rohtash. 17 kg 200 grams crushed poppy straw was recovered from case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that recovery from petitioner is of non-commercial quantity. It was crushed poppy straw. He is in custody since 9.8.2021. No further recovery is to be made. He is not involved in any other case under NDPS Act. Co-accused Charan Singh was granted bail by this Court on 30.9.2021.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail and submits that the matter is under investigation.

As per the case set up there was recovery of non-commercial quantity of poppy straw from the car of the petitioner. He is in custody since 9.8.2021. He has no criminal antecedents. Completion of investigation and conclusion of trial is likely to take time, bail is granted to the petitioner subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate Surender @ Bindrakhia vs State Of Haryana on 5 October, 2021 concerned.

The petition is allowed.

It is clarified that observations made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.