AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 409 wordsMahesh Chandra Sharma, J.—By filing instant criminal misc. petition the Petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.7.2010 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 12, Jaipur City, Jaipur (for short ''the trial court'') by which he rejected the application moved by the Petitioner u/s 70(2) Code of Criminal Procedure
Brief facts of the case are that an FIR was lodged against the Petitioner and four other persons at P.S. Moti Dungari for the offence Under Sections 147, 323 and 336 IPC on 30.7.1998. Thereafter, the police submitted charge-sheet under the aforesaid offences on 18.11.1998. On 24.3.2005 the trial Court forfeited the bail bonds of the Petitioner and issued arrest warrant against him. Thereafter, the Petitioner moved an application u/s 70(2) Code of Criminal Procedure which the trial Court dismissed the same vide order dated 21.7.2010.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that at the time of occurrence the Petitioner was a student and after that he started to work in a private firm at Delhi. He is suffering from Cardiac disease and for that purpose he has annexed with this petition the medical prescriptions. He submits that the Petitioner is neither a previous convicted person nor a habitual offender and he is a social person.
Learned PP seriously opposed the aforesaid submissions of learned Counsel for the Petitioner and submits that the trial court has rightly passed the order impugned and the order passed by the trial Court need no interference of this Court.
From a bare perusal of the case file it is clear that non-appearance of the Petitioner before the trial Court was bona-fide and not intentional.
In the result this criminal misc. petition stands disposed of and the order dated 21.7.2010 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 12, Jaipur City, Jaipur is modified with the following directions:
If the Petitioner submits bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, then he be enlarged on bail;
Before furnishing the bail bonds the Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 5,000/- as fine u/s 446 Code of Criminal Procedure before the trial Court;
The Petitioner will regularly remain present before the trial Court on the date fixed by it and shall not abscond in future.
In view of the order passed in the main petition, the stay application also stands disposed of.
