High Courts

Surendra vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 16 March 2005 · Citation: (2005) 03 AHC CK 0153

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.S.Rakhra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 437(6)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1204 (B) of 2005
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 120 words

K.S. Rakhra, J.—Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused record.

2.

The argument of the learned Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is entitled to bail under the provisions of Section 437 (6) Cr.P.C. as the trial has not concluded within 60 days from its commencement.

3.

The charge in the case was framed by the Magistrate on 9112004 and it has been submitted that the evidence has not yet commenced.

4.

In view of this, let the applicant Surendra be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000/each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned in Crime No. 93/04 under Section 457/380/411 I.P.C. P.S. Ibrahimpur District Ambedkar Nagar.