High CourtsSingle Bench

Surendrakumar Surjaram Hariyad vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 4 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 GUJ CK 0021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Divyesh A. Joshi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 — Section 5(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2), 116(B)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Successive Regular Bail - After Chargesheet) No. 19549 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 676 words

Divyesh A. Joshi, J

1.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regularbailinconnectionwith C.R.No.1187006220094 of 2022 registered with Lunawada Police Station, District Mahisagar for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2), 83 and 116(B) of the Prohibition Act.

2.

Learned advocate Mr. Pathan appears for the applicant accused submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. It is further submitted that applicant has been arrested on 15.07.2023 and since then he is in judicial custody.

Investigation is already completed and after submission of charge-sheet present bail application is preferred. Thus, looking to the overall facts of the present case, bail application of the applicant may be considered.

3.

Learned APP Mr. Manan Mehta appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has objected present bail application looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4.

Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5.

I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties. I have perused the police papers and other documents produced by the applicant along with the memo of the application. It is found out from the record that applicant has been arrested on 15.07.2023 and since then he is in judicial custody. Investigation is already completed and after submission of charge-sheet present bail application is preferred. Thus, looking to the overall facts of the present case, I am inclined to consider the case of the applicant.

6.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in case of Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. Reported in (2022)10 SCC 51.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regularbailinconnectionwith C.R.No.1187006220094 of 2022 registered with Lunawada Police Station, District Mahisagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[e] mark presence before the concerned Police Station on alternate Monday of every English calendar month for a period of six months between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m.;

[f] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

9.

The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

10.

At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

11.

The present application stands allowed accordingly. Direct service is permitted.