High CourtsSingle Bench

Surendran vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 31 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 KL CK 0182

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias C.P., J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Abkari Act 1 of 1077 — Section 55(i)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9202 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 378 words

Mohammed Nias C.P., J.

1.

This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.127/2023 of Kottarakkara Excise Range Office, Kollam, for having committed an offence punishable under Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 09.10.2023 at about 6.05 p.m., at a place which is approximately 600 meters West of Bathel Junction in Kulakkad East, Kottarakara Taluk, the petitioner was found engaged in selling Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) which comes to a quantity of 5.6250 litres and a sum of Rs.400/- was also found with him and he committed the offence alleged against him.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is totally innocent and falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner is in custody from 10.10.2023, and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

5.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and points out that the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

6.

After having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and considering the nature of the offences committed by the petitioner and the fact that he has been in custody since 10.10.2023, no antecedents are reported against the petitioner, since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner.

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed.

(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses;

(iv)The petitioner shall not be involved in any other crime while on bail.

(v) If any of the conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law.