High CourtsSingle Bench

Suresh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 9 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 RAJ CK 0004

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437 · Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1955 — Section 3, 7
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12215 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 118 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence this bail application is rejected.

However, the petitioner is permitted to surrender before the concerned trial court on or before 15.11.2021 and file an application for bail under Section 437 Cr.P.C. and it is expected from the concerned trial court that the bail application will be decided on the same day.

Till 15.11.2021, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.135/2020, PS Sedwa, District Barmer for offence under Sections 3 & 7 of Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 1955.