High CourtsSingle Bench

Suresh Kumar Mittal vs Union Of India & Anr.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 25 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 SIK CK 1093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 04 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 57 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The pleadings are complete. The learned Assistant Government Advocate submits that he does not desire to file counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not desire to file a rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.1.

2.

List the matter for hearing on 24.06.2026.