AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
30 paragraphs · 284 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has
been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in
connection with F.I.R. No.135/2016 registered at Police Station
Sumerpur, District Pali for the offences under Sections 366, 376
and 120B IPC.
The prosecutrix is a major woman. She was admittedly
married to the petitioner about 16 years ago. In her statement
recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she alleged that she had
procured a divorce from the petitioner from the Court but the
petitioner forcibly abducted her and her children and subjected her
to sexual assault despite the fact that they had been divorced. The
so-called divorce of the prosecutrix from the petitioner has not
been procured by the I.O. during investigation. The prosecutrix
admittedly stayed with the petitioner for a period of four months
without raising any protest whatsoever.
Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances available
on record but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner Suresh Kumar
deserves to be released on bail.
Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Suresh
Kumar arrested in connection with the F.I.R. No.135/2016
registered at Police Station Sumerpur, District Pali shall be
released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of
Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear
before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called
upon to do so.
