High CourtsSingle Bench

Suresh Rai And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 12 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 MP CK 0099

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunita Yadav, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 14398 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 461 words

@JUDGEMENTTAG-JUDGMENT

Sunita Yadav, J

This is first application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to FIR No. 125 of 2024 registered at Police Station Kurwai, District Vidisha (M.P.) for the offence under Section 34(2) of Excise Act.

As per prosecution story, 72 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from the joint possession of the applicants without having any valid license.

Learned counsel for the applicants argued that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated. Offence is triable by the JMFC. Trial is likely to take long time to conclude. The applicants are in custody since 29.03.2024.

They are permanent resident of District Vidisha (M.P.) and there is no possibility of their absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence.

Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicants.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond by each of the applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand

Only) each with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants:-

1) The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him/her/themselves;

2) The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3) The applicants will not indulge himself/herself/themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4 ) The applicants will not commit any other offence or will not repeat the offence in future. In case, if he/she is found involving in the offence of same nature, this bail order shall

stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Bench.

5) The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6 ) The applicant wills not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.