High CourtsSingle Bench

Suresh @ Titu vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0199

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section, 379, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1223 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 181 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

1.

Heard Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. J.S. Virk, learned AGA for the State.

2.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 03 of 2018 which has been registered under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC at P.S.

Khanpur, District Haridwar.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 26.03.2018.

4.

Considering the overall evidence which is presently available before this Court and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 26.03.2018, prima facie,

the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is hereby allowed.

5.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to

the satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.

6.

It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in

any other proceedings.