High CourtsSingle Bench

Surinder Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Anr

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 11 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 SHI CK 0020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3211 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 165 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

1.

Heard. Learned Deputy Advocate General on the basis of the instructions imparted to him, submitted that the respondent-department shall re-

examine the transfer order dated 27.5.2021, whereby the petitioner was transferred from ATMA, Kullu to ATMA, Keylong within two weeks from

today and while examining this order, the provisions of law as well as transfer policy shall be kept in mind by the competent authority. Learned Deputy

Advocate General further submitted that till a decision is taken upon re-examination of the order by the competent authority within the aforesaid

period, the impugned order shall not be acted upon insofar as the petitioner is concerned and status quo as exists on date shall be maintained in respect

of the petitioner.

In view of above submission, the petitioner does not press this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is disposed of reserving him liberty to take

appropriate remedy in case he still feels aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.