High CourtsSingle Bench

Surti Devi vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 27 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 P&H CK 0157

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 39595 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 137 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to the official respondents to take legal action against the private respondents.

The grievance raised in the petition is that representation dated 15.7.2020 was made to Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot but no action has

been taken.

Learned counsel for the State appearing on advance notice submits that earlier the petitioner was called with regard to the complaint made but she

never made herself available. She, on instructions, submits that the representation would be considered and decided expeditiously.

In view of the statement made, the petition is disposed of.

Let Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot decide the representation not later than 29.1.2021 and would take suitable action, if so required.