High CourtsSingle Bench

Surya Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 21 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 RAJ CK 0071

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 400 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 416 words

In the wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, the Court is functioning virtually and abundant caution is being maintained for the safety of all

concerned.

Admit.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

Counsel for the appellant submits out of total six years' sentence awarded, the appellant has already undergone more than 50% of the sentence i.e

three years plus.

Counsel for the appellant further submits that due to extreme COVID condition and the appellant having served more than half of sentence, the

appellant may be released on bail during pendency of appeal.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.

Having considered all the facts and circumstances of case, without making any observation on the merits of case, we are inclined to suspend the

sentence of the appellant(s).

Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence Application No.912/2021 filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive

sentence passed by learned Special Judge NDPS Act Cases, Bhilwara vide judgment dated 24.03.2021 in Sessions Case No.13/2018 against appellant

Surya Prakash S/o Radhyshyam shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 07.07.2021 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1.

That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2.

That if the appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the

High Court.

3.

Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case

related to original case in which the accused- appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready

reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case

the said accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of

bail.