Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Sushil Kumar Sinha vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 24 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 CAT CK 0136

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · A. K. Bishnoi, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 100, 672 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 125 words

A.K. Bishnoi, J

1.

The only grievance of the applicant is that the representation made by him is not being considered by the respondents.

2.

We heard Shri Yogesh Sharma, learned counsel for applicant and Shri Satish Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 & Shri S.M. Arif, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4.

3.

The applicant submitted a representation ventilating his grievances. It cannot be kept pending indefinitely. Hence, the OA is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation of the applicant through a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.