Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Swiftmail Communications Ltd vs A B Broadband Internet Service Provider

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 5 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 TDSAT CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biresh Kumar, Registrar
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Telecom Petition Nos. 66, 67, 68, 70, 71, 74, 75 , 76 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 148 words

In T.P.Nos.66, 67, 68, 70, 71, 74, 75 and 76 of 2020, the matter proceeds ex-parte against the Respondents. Reply has been filed on behalf of the

Respondent in T.P.No.69 of 2020. Four weeks time is prayed and allowed to the Petitioner to file their Rejoinder.

Mr. Raushan Kumar Bachchan appearing on behalf of the Respondent in T.P.No.72 of 2020 prays for further time for filing Vakalatnama as well as

Reply. On the last occasion, time was granted by way of last indulgence. Further time of four weeks is allowed to the Respondent in T.P.No.72 of

2020 for filing Vakalatnama along with Reply, if any. Further extension of time shall be subject to cost.

Four weeks further time is prayed and allowed to the Petitioner in T.P.No.73 of 2020 for filing their Reply to the Counter Claim-cum-Rejoinder. Let

the matter be listed on 10th February, 2022 for directions.