High CourtsSingle Bench

Tahir vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 6 July 2020 · Citation: (2020) 07 P&H CK 0022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaishree Thakur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 15964 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 367 words

Jaishree Thakur, J

The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 110 dated 23.02.2020, under

Section 20 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Sohna, District Gurugram.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner herein was taken into custody in the aforesaid FIR on 23.02.2020. It is submitted that

the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also contended that the FSL report is still awaited and till such time the FSL report is

not being received, the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on interim bail. In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the

judgment rendered in Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi and others vs. State of Punjab, 2014 (3) RCR (Criminal) 953.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, opposes the grant of regular bail to

the petitioner, however, does not dispute the fact that FSL report is still awaited.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since, in view of the judgment rendered in Inderjeet Singh @ Laddi and others vs. State of Punjab, 2014 (3) RCR (Criminal) 953 and the restricted

working of the Courts due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and that the petitioner herein has been in custody since 23.02.2020 and that FSL report is

still awaited and the trial will commence only after receipt of the FSL report, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petitioner behind bars.

At this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of and the petitioner is directed to be released on interim

bail on his execution of adequate personal and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate, till the FSL report is received.

The petitioner shall submit an undertaking before the trial Court/Duty Magistrate along with his bail/surety bonds that he will surrender before the trial

Court on receiving the FSL report.

However, it will be open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail if the petitioner is found misusing the concession of bail, in any manner.