High CourtsDivision Bench

Talman Rai vs State Of Sikkim

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 9 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 SIK CK 0037

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J · Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Interim Application No. 01 Of 2023 In Criminal Appeal 28 Of 2023 (Filing No.)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 140 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Heard Learned Legal Aid Counsel on I.A. No. 01 of 2023, which is an application filed by the Applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of two days delay in filing the instant Appeal.

Issue Notice to the State-Respondent.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present for the State-Respondent on advance Notice and waives formal Notice.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no serious objection to the delay of two days.

Considered submissions, we find that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the grounds are bona fide. We are inclined to exercise our discretion to condone the delay and order accordingly.

I.A. No.01 of 2023 stands disposed of.

Register the Appeal.

Heard on admission.

Admit the Appeal.

Call for the records from the Learned Trial Court.

Let Paper-Books be prepared.

List on 11-10-2023.