High CourtsSingle Bench(2015) 03 MAD CK 0486

Tamil Nadu Fly Ash Bricks and Block's Manufactures Association vs Union of India and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 March 2015

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.S. Sivagnanam, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 28471 of 2014 and M.P. No. 1 of 2014

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 788 words

T.S. Sivagnanam, J.

1.

The petitioner is an association of the Tamil Nadu Fly Ash Bricks and Block''s Manufactures and they seek for a direction upon the respondent namely the Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation and its contractors to use fly ash bricks in their Melakottaiyur Project for the Construction of 2673 flats as Multi Storied Residential Flats for the Deputy Superintendent of Police/Inspector of Police/Sub-Inspector of Police/Head Constables/Constables in an extent of 47.6 Acres of land.

2.

Heard both sides.

3.

The petitioner would state that there is a mandatory requirement to comply with the demand made by the petitioner in the light of the notification issued under the provisions of sub-section (1) read with Clause (v) of sub-section (2) of Section 3 and Section 5 of The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Central Act No. 29 of 1986) Notification No. S.O.: 763 (E) dated 14.09.1999 as amended by amendment Notification No. S.O.: 2804 (E) dated 03.11.2009.

4.

Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents 6 and 7 in the writ petition. From the counter affidavit, it is seen that in respect of the project which the petitioner states, it is a ''own your house'' project and the persons who are allotted are bound to pay the cost and the construction is undertaken by the Police Housing Corporation. It is stated that in respect of the said project, the work order was issued on 12.04.2013 and the construction has been fully completed. In this regard, photographs are also produced by the sixth respondent. Further, the sixth respondent in counter affidavit in paragraph No. 9 has stated as follows:

"9. I state that however, in compliance with the Government orders issued in this regard Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation Limited is utilising the fly ash bricks in the following construction projects:

a. Construction of Rural Police Station at Hasanur in Erode District.

b. Construction of 36 PC/HC Quarters at Sathiyamangalam in Erode District.

c. Construction of Model School Building at Ennamangalam in Erode District.

d. Construction of Model School Building at Mallur in Salem District.

e. Construction of Model School Building at Veerapandi in Salem District.

f. Construction of Model School Building at Avadathur in Salem District.

g. Construction of 2 DSP, 2 Inspector and 437 PC/HC quarters at Thoothukudi in Thoothukudi District.

h. Construction of Administrative block at Thoothukudi AR in Thoothukudi District.

i. Construction of 144 PC/HC quarters at Thoothukudi in Thoothukudi District.

j. Construction of District Jail at Perurani in Thoothukudi District.

k. Construction of one Addl. Superintendent, one Jailor, six Deputy Jailer and 45 Warden Quarters at Perurani in Thoothukudi District.

l. Construction of 59 PC/HC quarters at Vadivel Nagar in Karur District.

m. Construction of 48 PC/HC quarters at TSP Bn., in Trichy Dist."

5.

Further, it is stated that the Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation Limited has evolved a proposal for manufacturing fly ash bricks unit at Puzhal Prison Complex utilizing the services of the inmates of the Puzhal Prison Complex by using fly ash available from the thermal power station at Ennore and it is further stated that the fly ash bricks will be used in the Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation Limited projects.

6.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that notification was issued in the year 1999 and the petitioner had issued a notice to the sixth respondent to comply with the notification and inspite of the same, the sixth respondent has not complied with the notification.

7.

It is seen that the notice issued by the petitioner to the respondent Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation was received on 23.07.2014 whereas, the project in question has been handed over on 14.06.2013 and the work has commenced using chamber bricks. Furthermore, it has been pointed out that the project is ''own your house'' project, where the concerned police officers who are the allottee pay the cost of the flat and there is also a specific request made by the allottees to use chamber bricks and the Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation processed the entire contract much prior to the notice being issued by the petitioner.

8.

In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the project which the petitioner has referred to having already been completed, the question of directing the sixth respondent to use fly ash bricks for those flats does not arise. Accordingly, to that extent the writ petition is dismissed. With regard to the other contentions raised by the petitioner, it would suffice to record the stand taken by the Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation Limited in paragraph No. 9 of their counter affidavit.

9.

This writ petition is dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.