High CourtsSingle Bench

Tanjeel Ali vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 November 2023 · Citation: (2023) 11 UK CK 0068

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 201, 302, 392, 411
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Second Bail Application No. 343 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 102 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Tanjeel Ali is in judicial custody in FIR No.401 of 2021, under Sections 302, 201, 392, 201, 411, 120-B and 34 IPC, Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

This is the second bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.2587 of 2021, was rejected on 24.11.2022.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4.

Having considered, this Court does not see any new ground, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.

5.

The bail application is rejected.