AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 321 wordsManoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Petitioner took a loan from Uttarakhand Gramin Bank, Branch Harsila, District Bageshwar. Since, he could not re-pay the loan in time, therefore,
the respondent-Bank has issued a recovery certificate. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the recovery citation dated 22.04.2021 issued
against him.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to re-pay the outstanding amount at the earliest, therefore, some
reasonable time be given to the petitioner for re-payment of the loan amount, as due to lockdown, his business came to a grinding halt.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that outstanding liability of the petitioner is about Rs. 4,00,000/-. He, however, submits that he has
no objection, if reasonable time is given to the petitioner to deposit the amount.
In view of the readiness shown by the petitioner to re-pay the loan and also in view of the consent given by the learned counsel appearing for the
respondent-Bank, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) Petitioner shall approach the bank authorities by making representation within a period of four weeks from today.
(ii) If petitioner makes such representation within the stipulated period alongwith upfront deposit of Rs. 80,000/- to show his bonafide, then the
respondent-Bank shall inform the petitioner, within four days from date of receipt of representation alongwith certified copy of this order, about the
exact amount, which he is liable to re-pay.
(iii) Petitioner shall repay the remaining outstanding amount in nine monthly equal installments to be decided by the bank. Last installment shall carry
interest.
(iv) No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of nine months, pursuant to the impugned recovery citation.
(v) In case of any default by the petitioner, he shall not be entitled to protection of this order and respondent/Bank will be free to proceed against him,
in accordance with law.
