High CourtsSingle Bench

Tasbir @ Tasveer Kaur vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 P&H CK 0264

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No.14198 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 192 words

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an amount of Rs.31,250/- has been returned by the petitioner through Bank Draft No.540660 dated

20.03.2017 in favour of District Social Security Department.

Notice of motion was issued on 06.04.2018 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is directed to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer to join investigation on 16.04.2018 and in the event of her arrest, she shall be

released on bail on her furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of SHO/ Investigating Agency subject to the following conditions as envisaged under

Section 438(2) Cr.P.C:-

i) that the petitioner shall make himself/herself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when required;

ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

iii) that the petitioner shall not leave the country, without prior permission of the Court and shall surrender his/her passport, if any.

Petitions stands disposed of.