High CourtsDivision Bench

Tayenjam Chandrakumar Singh vs State Of Manipur & Ors

Manipur High Court · Decided on 13 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 MAN CK 1033

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Sundar, CJ · A. Guneshwar Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 242, 609 Of 2018, Miscellaneous Case (Writ Petition (C)) No.342 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 87 words

M. Sundar, CJ

[1] Ms. Geetarani Waikhom, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr. Dimal Kumar, learned State counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are before this Court (physical Court). Ms. L. Sillori, learned counsel representing counsel on record for respondent Nos. 3 & 4 is also before this Court (physical Court).

[2] All the afore-referred 3 (three) counsel request for adjournment citing difficulties/inconvenience for respective arguing counsel.

[3] Afore-referred common/joint request for adjournment is acceded to.

[4] List on 21.07.2026.