High CourtsSingle Bench

Tejpal vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 RAJ CK 0016

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Bhandari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 20
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10766 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 207 words
1.

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2.

F.I.R. No.165/2020 was registered at Police Station Kishanganj, District Baran for offence under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act.

3.

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is not having criminal

antecedents of like nature.

4.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5.

I have considered the contentions.

6.

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7.

This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the

satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all

subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

8.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner repeats the offence, State would be free to move application for cancellation of bail before the

concerned Court.