High CourtsDivision Bench

T.H. Burnett and Others vs W.H. Burton and Others

Patna High Court · Decided on 12 December 1928 · Citation: AIR 1929 Patna 110 : 116 Ind. Cas. 523a

HON’BLE JUDGES
James, J · Das, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bengal Cess Act, 1880 — Section 6
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 161 words

Das, J.—I have no doubt whatever that the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge is right. The lessee covenanted to pay

all taxes, rates, assessments and impositions whatsoever being in the nature of public demands which shall from time to time be charged, assessed or imposed upon or in respect of the mines or works of the lessee or any part thereof by authority of the Government of India or the Local Government.

2.

It has been held by the Judicial Committee that royalty is included within the term net annual profits as defined in Section 6, Cess Act. Now this being the position the assessment made upon the royalty is an assessment on the net annual profits of the mines, and the landlord is clearly entitled to recover the cesses which he has paid to the Collector upon the royalty from the tenants under the special contract with tenants. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

James, J.

3.

I agree.