High CourtsSingle Bench

Thakore Laxmansing Halsing vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 28 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 GUJ CK 0086

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hasmukh D. Suthar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Special Criminal Application (Parole Leave) No. 16781 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 238 words

Hasmukh D. Suthar, J

1.

Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent – State.

2.

By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to release him on parole leave for a period of 30 days on the ground of agricultural activity.

3.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent has opposed this application.

4.

Pursuant to the jail remarks it appears that the applicant-convict is in jail since 7 years and 6 months. The jail conduct of the applicant also appears to be good.

5.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and reasons stated in the application as well as looking to the jail record of the applicant, I am of the opinion that the present application requires consideration and the same is allowed. The applicant shall be released on parole leave for a period of Ten days from the date of his actual release on usual terms and conditions and on executing of personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail authority. The applicant shall surrender before the Jail Authority on completion of parole leave period, without fail and no further extension of parole leave shall be granted.

6.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned Jail Authority by fax / email message forthwith. Direct service is permitted.