AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 118 wordsBrodhurst and Tyreell, J.—The Courts below were wrong in applying the provisions of Article 179, Schedule ii of the Limitation Act to this case. The decree made on the 8th December 1881, provided expressly that the decree-holder might not apply for its execution till after expiry of four months from that date, that is to say, till after the 8th of April 1882. Therefore the limitation of Article 178 applies to the case before us. The decree-holder has three years from the date when the right to ask for execution accrued to him. His application of the 17th February 1885, being within three years from the 8th April, 1882, is not barred. The appeal is decreed with costs.
