AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
19 paragraphs · 332 wordsAnjani Kumar Sharan, J
This case has been posted before me for hearing through video- conferencing, under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice, in view of Nation
passing through lockdown as an aftermath of the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic.
The petitioner, by way of filing this writ application, has approached this Court for the following reliefs:-
(I) For issuance of writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondents to pay correct
pension payment (Rs.14,500/- in place of Rs.13,606/-getting) as per Govt. guidelines in favour of the petitioner.
(II) For issuance of an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to revise the pension of the petitioner
and to pay the arrear of pension amount Rs.2,14,467/- up to December, 2016.
(III) For issuance of an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the interest on the arrear
amount to be paid since enhancement of pension to the petitioners.
(IV) Any other relief/reliefs may be granted in favour of the petitioner for which he is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the
case.
Having heard the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that the nature of the dispute is such that it would warrant an adjudication by the
respondent authorities. Hence, I grant a liberty to the petitioner to approach before the respondent no. 2-the Principal Secretary, Finance Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna by filing an appropriate representation, stating out his claim as also annexing relevant judgments in his support, as he may
deem fit and proper, within a period of four weeks from today, whereupon the respondent no.2 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within a
period of 12 weeks thereafter.
It goes without saying that respondent no.2 will be solely responsible for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court within time, as aforesaid.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application stands disposed of.