High CourtsDivision Bench

Than Singh vs Chundun Singh and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 February 1885 · Citation: (1885) ILR (Cal) 296

HON’BLE JUDGES
Trevelyan, J · Mitter, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 147 words

Mitter and Trevelyan, JJ.—We are of opinion that in both these cases no second appeal lies. The suit of the plaintiff against the defendants was dismissed by the Munsiff. The plaintiff then filed an application for review, and that application was granted by the Munsiff. An appeal was preferred by the defendants against the order, granting a review u/s 629 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The District Judge set aside the order granting the review so far as the respondents in second appeal No. 2925 were concerned, but affirmed the order so far as the appellant in appeal No. 296 was concerned. Against the order of the District Judge, passed u/s 629, these two appeals have been preferred. There is no provision in the Code which allows a second appeal against the order passed on appeal u/s 629. Both these appeals are, therefore, dismissed without costs.