High CourtsDivision Bench

The Crown Prosecutor vs Khadir Mohideen

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 August 1927 · Citation: AIR 1927 Mad 1080 : (1928) ILR (Mad) 187 : (1927) 26 LW 568 : (1927) 53 MLJ 757

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 126 words

Jackson, J.—Appeal against the acquittal of a motor-bus owner for allowing his driver to drive his omnibus without a license in

contravention of Section 6 of Act VIII of 1914.

2.

The license had expired and the accused pleaded that the expiry was without his knowledge. A man cannot entrust his car to another person

and plead that he presumed that he was licensed. He must assure himself that he is licensed.

3.

The acquittal is accordingly set aside. Accused is found guilty of allowing his motor vehicle to be driven by a person without a license as proved

by P. Ws. 1 and 2 and is fined Rs. 5 (Rupees five), in default one week''s simple imprisonment--Sections 6 and 16 of Act VIII of 1914.