AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 487 wordsAlfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.—This is an appeal by the Provincial Government against the acquittal by the Chief Presidency Magistrate
of the respondent on a charge framed under Rule 28-B of the Madras Prevention of Adulteration Rules, 1932, framed under the Prevention of
Adulteration Act. The respondent is the Proprietor of a restaurant known as ""The Ramakrishna Lunch Home"" in China Bazar Road, Madras. He
makes and sells a sweetmeat called jangiri. The ingredients of jangiri are blackgram, rice and sugar. The sweetmeat is generally made by frying the
ingredients in ghee. It is said that in some hotels oil is used for this purpose. On the 25th February, 1944, a Food Inspector visited the
respondent''s restaurant and purchased a quantity of jangiri which was then being offered for sale. He had a sample analysed by the Public Analyst
of the Corporation of Madras, who found that the fat used for cooking this particular jangiri consisted of 50 per cent. ghee and 50 per cent, fat not
derived from milk or cream.
Rule 28-B says that where in a hotel, shop or other place sweetmeats, savouries or other articles of food of which ghee is commonly an
ingredient are for sale and are prepared wholly or in part with a mixture referred to in Rule 28 or with oil or fat other than ghee, there shall be
exhibited in the hotel, shop or other place one or more notices of such size and so placed as to be visible and clearly legible to any customer at the
time of purchase that the sweetmeats, savouries, or other articles of food are not made of ghee. There was no such notice exhibited in the
respondent''s restaurant and consequently it is said that he infringed this rule. The Chief Presidency Magistrate held that ghee or oil or other fatty
substance used for frying jangiri is not an ingredient of the sweetmeat and consequently he acquitted the respondent.
The Chief Presidency Magistrate accepted the definition of "" ingredient "" as given in Chambers'' Dictionary, namely,
that which enters into a compound; a component part of anything."" One definition of the word given in the Oxford Dictionary is:
Something that enters into the formation of a compound; a component part, constituent element.
We agree with the Chief Presidency Magistrate that the material used for cooking jangiri is not an ingredient. The ingredients are blackgram, rice
and sugar and they have to be cooked together in order to make jangiri; but this does not mean that the cooking material is part of the sweetmeat.
No doubt some of the cooking material does penetrate into the jangiri but that does not make it an ingredient. If the argument advanced by the
Crown Prosecutor were to he accepted, it would mean that the fat used in frying fish must be regarded as an ingredient of the fish.
The appeal is dismissed.
