High CourtsSingle Bench

The Empress vs Dabee Pershad

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 31 January 1881 · Citation: (1881) ILR (Cal) 532

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prinsep, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 33 · Presidency Magistrates (Court- Fees) Act, 1877 — Section 158
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 93 words

Prinsep, J.—The deposition is inadmissible. Section 76 of the High Courts'' Criminal Procedure Act contemplates that evidence, when taken upon commission, if intended to be used in the High Court, must be taken upon an order made by that Court under that section. The terms of Section 158 of the Presidency Magistrates'' Act, quoted by Mr. Phillips, refer only to the record of the trial or enquiry before the Magistrate. The evidence taken by a commission issued by order of a Magistrate could not here be admissible u/s 33 of the Evidence Act.