High CourtsSingle Bench

The Indian Performing Right Society Limited vs Nanu Enterprises and Another

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 January 2002 · Citation: (2002) 01 DEL CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.K. Jain, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 39 Rule 3
CASE NUMBER
Suit No. 129 of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 240 words

D.K. Jain, J.

IA No. 539/02.

1.

Allowed subject to justice exceptions.

IA540/02

2.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the deficient court fee will be filed during the course of the day. Let him do so. In view of the statement no further order''s are required in the application and the same stands disposed of.

Suit No. 129/02

3.

Let the plaint be registered as suit and summons issue to the defendants, by ordinary process as well as registered A/D post, for 6 February 2002.

IA 538/02

4.

Notice for 6 February 2002.

5.

Having heard learned counsel for the plaintiff, I am of the view that at this stage a limited interim protection deserves to be granted to the plaintiff in order to prevent irreparable loss to them. Accordingly, it is directed that without prejudice to the rights of both the parties, if the defendants fail to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 26,280/-, demanded as license fee for the period of 1 November 2000 to 31 October 2001, within one week of the receipt of this order, they will not be entitled to use to communicate to the public/public performance the plaintiff society''s copy right musical works, either by channeling the music through public address system or channeling the same through cable television to their hotel rooms.

6.

plaintiff to comply with the provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 CPC within three days. dusty.