High Courts

The Queen vs Sham Sundar Chowdhry

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 December 1868 · Citation: (1868) 12 CAL CK 0019

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 83 words

Loch, J.—We concur with the Sessions Judge in thinking that the view taken by the Magistrate is erroneous. We think that if the accused have forfeited his recognizance given to the Magistrate of Tipperah by committing a breach of the peace in Sylhet of which he has been convicted and punished, the Magistrate of the former district can proceed under the provisions of Section 293 of the Criminal Procedure Code. We, therefore, set aside the order passed by the Magistrate in this case.

The Queen Vs Sham Sundar Chowdhry · CourtKutchehry