High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 04 KL CK 0073

The Thiruvilwamala Grama Panchayath vs The State of Kerala and Others

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 April 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Basant, J · K. Surendra Mohan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) . No. 10341 of 2011 (P)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 428 words

R. Basant, J.—Petitioner, a grama panchayat, has come to this Court seeking issue of directions to Respondents 2 to 5, all police officials under the 1st Respondent- State, to ensure that adequate police protection is granted.

2.

According to the Petitioner, a burial and burning ground is there within the jurisdiction of the Petitioner panchayat. Because of various facilities available there, dead bodies from many parts of Kerala are being brought to the said burial and burning ground for disposal. Local people have raised objections to such burning and burial consequent to the perceived threat to environment. The grama panchayat had taken a decision to ban such burning and burial of bodies brought from outside the panchayat subject of course to certain safeguards. That decision of the panchayat has been stayed by the Government in exercise of its powers u/s 191 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act.

3.

The Petitioner panchayat apprehended that there could be a clash between different groups of persons at present, ie. after the decision of the panchayat was stayed by the Government. Persons may continue to bring bodies for burial/burning and that may be opposed by some persons of the locality. The Petitioner apprehended threat to law and order and threat of violence. It is, in these circumstances, that the Petitioner came to this Court.

4.

The Petitioner does not seek police protection for itself. The only request of the Petitioner is that it may be ensured that adequate police protection is afforded to ensure that there is no breach of the peace and violence within the jurisdiction of the Panchayat.

5.

Notice was given and the learned Government Pleader has entered appearance for Respondents 1 to 5. The learned Government Pleader submits that no specific directions under Article 226 need be issued now. Perceiving the seriousness of the situation, the police have already made adequate arrangements to afford police protection to prevent any breach of the peace and violence in the locality. The apprehension of the Petitioner appears to be justified and the police have been compelled to register a crime against as many as 53 persons on 01.04.2011. Those accused persons were arrested. They have now been enlarged on bail. Recurrence of such activity is apprehended and the police are geared to meet the situation, submits the learned Government Pleader.

6.

We accept the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. We are satisfied that no specific directions need be issued by this Court now.

7.

This Writ Petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed accepting the submissions of the learned Government Pleader.