High CourtsSingle Bench

Tilak Raj And Others vs State Of HP And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 24 March 2022 · Citation: (2022) 03 SHI CK 0078

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 324
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 78 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 471 words

Ajay Mohan Goel, J

1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of FIR No. 206/2020, dated 16.08.2020, registered under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Haroli, District Una, H.P. as well as ensuing criminal proceedings pending before the court concerned.

2.

I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Counsel for respondents No. 4 to 6 and learned Additional Advocate General.

3.

Respondents No. 4 to 6 are present in person in the Court. Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, learned Counsel representing the complainant Sh. Ashvinder Singh, victims Smt. Rajni and Smt. Chanchal Rani, states that the matter has been duly compromised between the parties and complainant as well as victims have no objection in case this petition is allowed.

4.

Statement of respondent No. 4, namely, Sh. Ashvinder Singh, who has been duly identified by his Counsel Mr. Abhinav Purohit, Advocate, has been independently recorded in the Court, wherein he has stated that they have entered into a compromise with the petitioners/accused as the issue which led to registration of FIR in question has been amicably settled between them taking into consideration their close relationship with the accused and they want to live in peace and harmony. He further stated that they are not interested in pursuing further the FIR No. 206/2020, dated 16.08.2020, registered under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Haroli, District Una, H.P. as well as ensuing criminal proceedings pending before Court concerned. A copy of the compromise so arrived at between the parties is appended with the petition as Annexure P/3 and execution of the same as also the contents thereof have also been acknowledged by respondent No. 4. He has also acknowledged his signatures on Compromise Deed Annexure P/3.

5.

Learned Additional Advocate General has also very fairly submitted that the respondent-State has no objection in case petition is allowed and FIR as well as consequential criminal proceedings, if any, pending trial, are quashed and set aside.

6.

Accordingly, in view of above, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 206/2020, dated 16.08.2020, registered under Sections 323 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Haroli, District Una, H.P. as well as ensuing criminal proceedings pending before ACJM, Una and Principal Juvenile Justice Board, Una, are ordered to be quashed and set aside, taking into consideration the compromise entered between the parties and statement to this effect, made by respondent No. 4, namely, Sh. Ashvinder Singh, in this Court, which shall form part of the judgment.

Petition is accordingly disposed of in above terms, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.