AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Minor defects are ignored.
Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2-State and Dr.
Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due
to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been
heard.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for direction upon the respondents to fix the salary of the petitioner no.1 under 5th and 6th pay revision
since 01.01.1996 and 01.01.2006 respectively and fix the salary of petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 under 6th pay revision since 20.08.2001, 01.03.2011 and
20.04.2012 respectively.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 was appointed on compassionate ground on 18.07.1995 in 4th grade
in G.C. Jain Commerce College, Chaibasa against the vacancy caused due to death on the posts. Petitioner no.2 has been appointed on compassionate
ground on the post of Typist-cum-Clerk on 18.08.2001. Petitioner no.3 has been appointed on compassionate ground on the post of Peon on
01.03.2011. Petitioner no.4 has been appointed on compassionate ground on Grade IV post on 20.04.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that petitioner no.1 has been paid salary under 4th pay revision. He further submits that the salary of the petitioners are not being paid in terms of 5th
and 6th pay revision. He also submits that the petitioners have already filed representation on 12.02.2019 which is Annexure-9 to the writ petition but
the same has not been decided yet.
Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that the university will take decision in accordance with rules, regulations and guidelines.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2-State accepts the argument of learned counsel for respondent no.3 and submits
that case of the petitioner is need to be decided.
Considering the above submission of the parties, the petitioners are directed to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 with all credentials
within a period of three weeks from today. If such representation is filled within the aforesaid period, the respondent no.3 shall take a decision in
accordance with rules, regulations and guidelines in this regard and will pass order within a period of eight weeks.
With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands dispose of.