AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
7 paragraphs · 171 wordsThe Collector having done all that he could do under the Land Acquisition Act was not, in our opinion, precluded from bringing this suit in an
ordinary Civil Court, there being no prohibition by any enactment against his doing so. The next question is whether the suit should have been
brought in a Small Cause Court, assuming that there was one having jurisdiction up to Rs. 500, which appears not to have been the case. Having
regard to Article 14 of the second schedule of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, which excludes suits for the recovery of compensation paid
under the Land Acquisition Act from the small cause jurisdiction, we think the present, which is a substantially similar suit, did not lie in the Small
Cause Court, as it involved, not incidentally but necessarily, the determination of a title to land, and would consequently fall under Article 11. In this
view, a second appeal lay, and a petition for revision is not admissible. It is accordingly dismissed with costs.