High Courts(1898) 08 MAD CK 0003

Tirupatiraju vs Rajagopala Kristnama Razu and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 August 1898 · Citation: (1898) 8 MLJ 271

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 79 words
1.

We agree with the Judge that the Article of the Limitation Act applicable is 61, but we find that under that Article the suit is not barred by

limitation as the money, in respect of which contribution is sought, was not paid till 31st January, 1894, and this suit was brought on the 5th January

1897.

2.

We, therefore, reverse the decree appealed against and remand the suit for fresh disposal. Costs to abide and follow the result.