High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 03 SIK CK 1242

Titan Company Limited vs Union Of India And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 6 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 08 Of 2026

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 218 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Heard Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner.

Issue Notice to the Respondents.

Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India is present for the Respondents No.1 to 7, 9 and 10 on advance Notice and waives formal Notice.

Learned Assistant Government Advocate is present for the Respondent No.8 on advance Notice and waives formal Notice.

Heard Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner on I.A. No.01 of 2026, which is an application for stay of the operation of the impugned Demand Note dated 11-02-2026, with reference to the Demand Note 54/Demand Note/Budgetary Support/Titan/Gtk-Div/2025-26, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST), Gangtok Division, Siliguri CGST & CX Commissionerate, Respondent No.3 herein, under Notification dated 05-10-2017, providing for a scheme of budgetary supported with an Affidavit.

Learned Deputy Solicitor General across the Bar has submitted a communication dated 05-03-2026, made by Respondent No.3, to the Petitioner, wherein it is inter alia stated that the Respondent No.3 is pleased to grant the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing on 09-03-2026. This communication admittedly has been electronically received by the Petitioner.

Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, at this juncture Learned Deputy Solicitor General submits that no coercive measures will be taken against the Petitioner in the interregnum.

List on 13-03-2026 as found convenient by the parties.